Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568448›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021

False memories activate distinct brain regions in females and males.

Dylan S Spets, Jessica M Karanian, Scott D Slotnick

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dylan S SpetsDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, USA.
Jessica M KaranianDepartment of Psychology, Fairfield University, USA.
Scott D SlotnickDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The constructive process of memory is generally successful; however, it can also lead to memory failures such as false memories. Although true memories and false memories rely on some of the same brain regions, these memory types are also mediated by distinct neural substrates. Of relevance, there is a growing body of evidence that there are sex differences in the brain during true memories. However, no studies have investigated whether there are neural sex differences during false memories. In the current fMRI study, across all subjects, false memories produced activity in the precentral sulcus and superior parietal lobule, replicating previous findings. Males produced greater activity than females in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parietooccipital sulcus, and fusiform gyrus. Females produced greater activity than males in the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, paracentral lobule, supramarginal gyrus, lateral sulcus, cingulate sulcus, the putamen, and V1. An interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between sex and region with a higher magnitude of activity in the hippocampus for males than females and a higher magnitude of activity in V1 for females than males. The current results suggest that false memories are supported by distinct brain regions and cognitive processes in females and males.

Indexed as

False memoryfMRIHippocampusLanguage processing cortexSex differencesV1

Identifiers

PMID40568448
PMCPMC12172779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.