ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021
False memories activate distinct brain regions in females and males.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disentangling False Memories: Gray Matter Correlates of Memory Sensitivity and Decision Bias.NeuroSci · 2025Article
- Are False Memory and Creative Thinking Mediated by Common Neural Substrates? An fMRI Meta-Analysis.Creativity research journal · 2025Article
- Remembering what did not happen: the role of hypnosis in memory recall and false memories formation.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
- Dynamics of working memory process revealed by independent component analysis in an fMRI study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying false memories: misinformation, distortion or erroneous configuration?AIMS neuroscience · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The constructive process of memory is generally successful; however, it can also lead to memory failures such as false memories. Although true memories and false memories rely on some of the same brain regions, these memory types are also mediated by distinct neural substrates. Of relevance, there is a growing body of evidence that there are sex differences in the brain during true memories. However, no studies have investigated whether there are neural sex differences during false memories. In the current fMRI study, across all subjects, false memories produced activity in the precentral sulcus and superior parietal lobule, replicating previous findings. Males produced greater activity than females in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, parietooccipital sulcus, and fusiform gyrus. Females produced greater activity than males in the medial prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, paracentral lobule, supramarginal gyrus, lateral sulcus, cingulate sulcus, the putamen, and V1. An interaction analysis revealed a significant interaction between sex and region with a higher magnitude of activity in the hippocampus for males than females and a higher magnitude of activity in V1 for females than males. The current results suggest that false memories are supported by distinct brain regions and cognitive processes in females and males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.