ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021
Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging in a randomized clinical trial for Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity has been used to study Alzheimer's disease, revealing underlying differences between groups of individuals at different levels of cognitive impairment, or groupwise changes over time. Most of these studies have employed a single scanner and/or a single scan per subject. In this study, we used data collected from a substudy to two randomized clinical trials in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's Disease to investigate the robustness of functional connectivity in a multicenter, longitudinal setting. This substudy was not powered to detect drug treatment effects. With a basic imaging charter for inter-site acquisition standardization, we found no changes to functional connectivity over time in the placebo group, despite observable changes in clinical test scores and regional brain atrophy. We infer that functional connectivity, as implemented in our study, is not sensitive enough to detect disease progression in our patients. Using an 8-week interval between scans (in both treatment and placebo groups), we found that our test-retest reproducibility was comparable with other published results. We also found that the dominant source of measurement variability was within individuals over time, compared with variability between subjects and sites. Finally, we propose a simple method of visual inspection to identify scans that should be excluded from longitudinal analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.