Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568412›Full record

ArticleInnovation in aging2025

Social Network Types and Self-Rated Health Among Diverse Older Adults: Stability, Transitions, and Implications for Health Equity.

Lissette M Piedra, James Iveniuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Innovation in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Social network structure and composition predicting cognitive impairment: racial/ethnic differences among older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lissette M PiedraSchool of Social Work, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5201-5170
James IveniukNational Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-1201

Funding

National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Round 5R01AG048511 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI LINDA J WAITE · 2014 to 2026
$49.5M
National Social Life, Health and Aging: Wave 4R01AG043538 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI LINDA J WAITE · 2013 to 2026
$42.7M
Resources and DisseminationP30AG066619 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Vincent Joseph Hotz, DAVID O MELTZER · 2020 to 2026
$6.8M
Enhancing NSHAP Caregiving & Social Network Measures to Contextualize Aging & Family Caregiving of AD/ADRD among English- and Spanish-speaking Latino Older AdultsR56AG083174 · NIA · NATIONAL OPINION RESEARCH CENTER · PI PIEDRA, LISSETTE · 2023 to 2024
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066619NIA NIH HHS R01 AG043538NIA NIH HHS R01 AG048511NIA NIH HHS R56 AG083174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objectives: This study explores how social networks among older adults evolve over time and their impact on self-rated health (SRH), emphasizing differences across ethnoracial and linguistic groups. Though the link between social networks and well-being is well-known, how these networks change and affect health remains less understood. Research Design and Methods: The study examined changes in social network types across 3 rounds of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. The initial sample included 3 005 individuals, which decreased to 1 592 by the final follow-up. We analyzed data from participants in every round, totaling 6 858 observations, using Random-Intercept Latent Transition Analysis. Multinomial logistic regressions were conducted to predict network membership and transitions and to assess correlations with SRH. Results: We identified 3 distinct social network types: "Enriched," "Focused," and "Restricted." "Enriched" networks feature broad connections, high marriage rates, active engagement, and low loneliness. "Focused" networks involve small, close-knit groups with frequent interactions, moderate marriage rates, and low loneliness. "Restricted" networks are family-oriented, with low marriage rates and the highest loneliness levels. Over time, "Restricted" networks became more prevalent, whereas "Focus" networks showed the most mobility. Network type membership varied significantly by ethnoracial identity and gender, with Black, Hispanic, and female respondents less likely to belong to "Enriched" networks. Membership in "Enriched" networks was linked to better SRH scores. Discussion and Implications: The growth of "Restricted" networks over time raises concerns about older adults becoming confined to limited social environments. However, there is a silver lining: within the "Focused" group, more individuals transition to "Enriched" networks than to "Restricted" ones, indicating that older adults can expand their social connections as they age. Understanding the factors driving this shift can guide interventions to promote network expansion for vulnerable groups, enhancing social well-being, and mitigating the risks associated with restricted networks.

Indexed as

Aging and life courseHealth disparitiesHealth trajectories

Identifiers

PMID40568412
PMCPMC12188437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.