ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2024
Post-processing of a distributed source method for the localization of somatosensory cortex in a cohort of epilepsy patients.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Localizing eloquent cortices is crucial for many neurosurgical applications, such as epilepsy and tumor resections. Clinicians may use non-invasive methods such as magnetoencephalography (MEG) to localize these cortical regions using equivalent current dipoles (ECDs). While dipoles are clinically validated, they provide the estimated strength, location, and orientation of only one or a few sources that best describe the recorded neuromagnetic data, requiring clinicians to make subjective decisions on the spatial extent of the underlying cortical area. More accurate delineation of eloquent cortical areas using distributed source localization methods would provide additional pre-surgical information on these regions' location and spatial distribution, which could lead to reduced post-surgical complications associated with damage to or removal of eloquent cortices. Our objective in this paper was to present a method to post-process the distributed source localization results to yield a directly interpretable, distributed region of activation. As a test case, we selected somatosensory stimulation in a retrospective cohort of focal and multi-focal epilepsy patients. Our algorithm performs source localization using a distributed method (sLORETA), followed by post-processing and blind source separation to identify the area and boundary of the cortical tissue that primarily activates in response to somatosensory stimulation. We calculated the statistical significance of localization by comparing the identified region to an anatomical atlas and random chance. While examining patients who received left (upper left, UL) and right (upper right, UR) sided median nerve stimulation, the cortical areas identified by the algorithm were in anatomically appropriate areas with a median overlap of 97.6% and 94.7%, respectively. We observe that our algorithm localized somatosensory responses better than random chance in 57/58 (98%) patients who performed the UL task (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.