Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568376›Full record

ArticleAdvances in rehabilitation science and practice

Synergistic integration of epidural spinal cord stimulation with robotic therapy and neurorehabilitation to facilitate functional recovery in chronic sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury: A case series.

Seng Kwee Wee, Zhi Yan Ng Valerie, Min Wee Phua, Wen Li Lui, Fatimah Misbaah, Rui Xin Justin Ker, Wai Hoe Ng, Kai Rui Wan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in rehabilitation science and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05644171 (RESTORES Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05644171 narecruitingnot on this map

RESTORES Trial: RESToration Of Rehabilitative Function With Epidural Spinal Stimulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Neuroscience InstituteRan2022 to 2031Enrolled18ConditionsChronic Spinal Cord InjuryArmsRESToration Of Rehabilitative function with Epidural spinal Stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Response to the Letter to the Editor.Advances in rehabilitation science and practice
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seng Kwee WeeDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5206-6269
Zhi Yan Ng ValerieDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Min Wee PhuaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Wen Li LuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-8453
Fatimah MisbaahDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Rui Xin Justin KerDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Wai Hoe NgDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.
Kai Rui WanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Neuroscience Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To present the rehabilitation considerations in prehabilitation and the rehabilitation phase post spinal cord stimulator implantation; and to evaluate the efficacy of synergistic combination of epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) with motor imagery, trunk rehabilitation, robotic and overground gait training in improving mobility in persons with sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury (SCI). Design: A non-controlled before-after clinical trial. Methods: Epidural spinal cord stimulators were implanted into 3 participants with complete thoracic SCI (Thoracic 4, Thoracic 2 and Thoracic 10 respectively). They underwent 1 month of prehabilitation, followed by 7 months of daily rehabilitation post-implantation, consisting of SCS, motor imagery, trunk rehabilitation, robotic therapy and overground gait training. Pre-post assessments include the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) examination, Spinal Cord Independence Measure version III (Mobility subscale) (SCIM-III), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II), Trunk Assessment Scale for Spinal Cord Injury (TASS), Five Times Sit-to-Stand (5×STS) and 2-minute Walk Test (2mWT). Results: Post rehabilitation, there were improvements in WISCI-II, TASS, 5×STS and 2mWT in all 3 participants; and no change in AIS sensory scores. Only participants 2 and 3 exhibited slight improvement in SCIM-III. The WISCI-II of all participants improved, ranging from 3 levels to 9 levels, which was considered a clinically meaningful change. Furthermore, the change in TASS exceeded the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 4 points for two participants. The change in 5×STS exceeded the MCID of 2.27 seconds for all participants. These significant improvements translated into the participants' ability to perform sit-to-stand independently and ambulate with a rollator frame under supervision of a carer. Conclusion: This clinical trial demonstrated proof-of-concept and promising findings that support our rehabilitation protocol in improving functional mobility of people with sensorimotor complete SCI, which may be replicated in future studies.*The study protocol was registered with Clinical-trials.gov (NCT05644171; Registered 13 November 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05644171).

Indexed as

epidural spinal cord stimulationgait trainingmotor imageryneuromodulationneuroplasticityrobot-assisted therapyspinal cord injurytrunk rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40568376
PMCPMC12188076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.