ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2024
Assessment of Patient Waiting Time in Primary Health Care Settings in Rwanda: A Mixed-Method Study.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Determinants of patient cycle time in primary healthcare: a large-scale retrospective study from Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient waiting time as an important indicator of quality of services has been a long-standing concern in health care. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess patient waiting time in primary health care settings in Rwanda. Methods: This was a mixed-method study design. In quantitative phase, Patient Flow Time Log was used to track the time patients spent waiting for the service. On exit, a structured questionnaire was administered. Observations were conducted to capture information regarding the flow and processes. In qualitative part, six focus group discussions with patients were conducted. Semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers were held. Results: Among 410 participants, the majority were females (77.1%). The overall health centre level waiting time was 211 minutes (3.5 hours). To receive a service, patients waited an average of 81.5 minutes (1.4 hours). Three conceptual themes were identified: a) reported sections to have long wait time; b) causes of long waiting time; and c) needs for activities to spend time on as patients wait. Conclusion: Most patients experienced prolonged waiting times during their visit to the primary health care settings, and the major factors were the huge number of patients, few healthcare providers, and lack of medical equipment. To effectively address these challenges, more resources and personnel must be allocated to primary healthcare settings to help foster a higher level of client satisfaction with minimal primary healthcare waiting time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.