ArticleCureus2025
Two Decades of Disparity: Racial and Geographic Trends in Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the United States (2000-2020).
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- U.S. Colorectal Cancer Mortality, 1999-2023: A 25-Year National Analysis of Trends and Disparities.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Article
- Colorectal Cancer in the U.S., 1999-2021: Declining Rates, Rising Concerns, and Persistent Disparities.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Pre-pandemic patterns in colorectal cancer mortality and Black-White inequities across the 30 most populous US cities.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2025Article
- Trends and disparities in the US colorectal cancer mortality, 1999-2023: an analysis of the CDC WONDER database.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. While overall mortality has declined due to improvements in screening and treatment, persistent disparities by race, sex, and geography raise concerns about equitable healthcare access. Objective The objective of the study is to assess long-term trends in CRC mortality in the United States from 2000 to 2020, with a focus on racial, sex-based, and geographic disparities. Materials and methods A retrospective observational study was conducted using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) database. CRC mortality was identified using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes C18-C21. Data were stratified by race, sex, and U.S. state. Age-adjusted death rates per 100,000 population were calculated and averaged over the 20-year period. Poisson regression analysis was conducted to assess the independent association of race and sex with mortality. Results were visualized by subgroup and geographic distribution. Results Black men had the highest national CRC mortality rate (17.7/100,000), followed by White men (15.3/100,000). Men consistently experienced higher mortality than women across all racial groups. Asian/Pacific Islander and American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations had the lowest age-adjusted rates. Southern and Midwestern states demonstrated the highest average state-level mortality rates. Poisson regression confirmed that White (rate ratio (RR): 2.46), Black (RR: 2.24), and Asian (RR: 1.13) individuals had higher mortality than AI/AN individuals. Men had 9.2% higher mortality than women (RR: 1.09). All results were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion Significant disparities in CRC mortality persist across racial, sex, and regional lines in the United States. Black men experience the highest age-adjusted mortality, and overall rates are consistently higher among men than women. States in the South and Midwest carry the greatest burden, underscoring the need for geographically targeted interventions. These findings highlight the urgency of expanding access to screening, addressing systemic inequities, and implementing risk-based public health strategies in underserved communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.