ArticleCureus2025
Automated Workflow for Processing and Classifying Dental Radiographs: A Hands-On Approach.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Classifying large dental radiographic datasets enables efficient data management and retrieval, facilitating quick access to specific types of radiographs for clinical or research purposes. It also supports advanced analytics, research, and the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools. This study aimed to develop an automated workflow to improve the efficiency of dental radiograph classification. The workflow covers the entire process, from retrieving Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) files to converting them into Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) format and classifying them using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) on a large dataset. Materials and methods This cross-sectional machine learning study was conducted using 48,329 dental radiographs to develop an automated classification workflow using CNNs. The workflow involved retrieving 48,329 DICOM files, standardizing them to a uniform size, and converting them to JPEG using the Pydicom library. Image preprocessing, including normalization, prepared the images for machine learning analysis. Various models, such as ResNet-50, AlexNet, and custom CNN models, were trained, validated, and tested on distinct datasets. Results These models were then deployed to classify a dataset of 48329 images. AlexNet demonstrated the highest performance, with a 95.98% detection rate and no errors, while ResNet-50 achieved 92.3% accuracy with 194 errors, and the custom CNN model showed a 77.25% detection rate with 1,623 errors. Conclusion The study established an effective automated workflow for dental radiograph classification, demonstrating that CNN models significantly improve classification accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.