Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568236›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021

Relation between the phase-lag index and lagged coherence for assessing interactions in EEG and MEG data.

Rikkert Hindriks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rikkert HindriksDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last two decades, a large number of estimators have been proposed to assess brain connectivity from electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. The statistical theory underlying these estimators, however, is relatively underdeveloped. In particular, the theoretical relationships between different estimators were unknown until very recently. In a recent preprint, Nolte et al. derived formulas for such relationships under the assumption that the data are Gaussian. One of the results was that the phase-lag index and the lagged coherence concentrate around identical values for large sample sizes, i.e. have identical asymptotic limits. A proof of this statement, however, was only sketched, the model assumptions were not checked in experimental data, and sampling properties of the estimators were not considered. We derive the probability density of the relative-phase in the Gaussian model and use it to provide an alternative proof of the asymptotic equality of the phase-lag index and the lagged coherence. The proof is based on power series expansions of the Fourier coefficients of the phase-lag index and the lagged coherence, which are demonstrated to be hypergeometric functions. We also assess the sampling properties of the phase-lag index and the lagged coherence through numerical simulations from the Gaussian model. These demonstrate that throughout the entire parameter space of the model and for all sample sizes, the standard error of the phase-lag index is higher than that of the lagged coherence and thus establish that the lagged coherence is a uniformly better estimator than the phase-lag index. We use experimental EEG and MEG data to verify to what extent the Gaussian assumption is appropriate. Deviations from normality were observed precisely at frequencies for which EEG/MEG power spectra had local maxima, i.e. at oscillatory resonances. Depending on the data-set, the resonances were located in the delta, alpha, and beta frequency bands and correspond to the respective brain rhythms. Based on these observations, we propose to model EEG/MEG data with exponential power densities, which include the Gaussian and Laplace densities as special cases. Lastly, we demonstrate that the asymptotic equality of the phase-lag index and the lagged coherence, as well as the large relative standard errors of the phase lag index, also hold in experimental EEG/MEG data. This establishes that the lagged coherence is not only a better estimator for Gaussian data, but for experimental EEG/MEG data as well.

Indexed as

Functional connectivityLagged coherencePhase-lag index

Identifiers

PMID40568236
PMCPMC12172864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.