ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
From data to medical context: the power of categorization in healthcare.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving healthcare domain, the ability to structure and interpret contextual medical data is crucial for delivering personalized and efficient patient care. While many existing studies attempt to define medical context through diverse categorizations, they often lack completeness or applicability in the real-world healthcare domain. This paper introduces a novel and comprehensive context categorization model composed of fifteen well-defined categories, bridging the gap between theoretical models and practical requirements in telemonitoring systems for chronic disease management. By incorporating important but often overlooked components such as social determinants, Service Level Agreements (SLAs), and environmental factors our model enhances clarity and strengthens decision-making in clinical settings. We validate the applicability of this framework through detailed case studies on asthma, COPD, and cardiovascular diseases, demonstrating its utility in enhancing telehealth solutions and aiding early intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.