ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Persistent representation of a prior schema in the orbitofrontal cortex facilitates learning of a conflicting schema.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Schemas allow efficient behavior in new situations, but reliance on them can impair flexibility when new demands conflict, culminating in psychopathology. Evidence implicates the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in deploying schemas in new situations congruent with previously acquired knowledge. But how does this role affect learning of a conflicting behavioral schema? Here we addressed this question by recording single-unit activity in the OFC of rats learning odor problems with identical external information but orthogonal rules governing reward. Consistent with schema formation, OFC representations adapted to track the underlying rules, and both performance and encoding was faster on subsequent than initial problems. Surprisingly however, when the rule governing reward changed, persistent representation of the prior schema was correlated with acquisition of the new. Thus, OFC was not a source of interference and instead supported new learning by accurately and independently representing the old schema as the new was acquired.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.