Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568040›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2022

Meso-scale network analysis of resting state-fMRI brain network connectivity performs poorly as a prognostic tool in critically ill traumatic brain injury patients.

Jonathan Tjerkaski, William H Thompson, Bo-Michael Bellander, Eric P Thelin, Peter Fransson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan TjerkaskiDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
William H ThompsonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bo-Michael BellanderDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Eric P ThelinDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter FranssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prognostication is important in the management of critically ill traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients, as it may guide decisions on treatment intensity. Changes in functional connectivity that arise due to TBI have been observed in several brain networks using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). Studies suggest that cognitive dysfunction following TBI can, in part, be explained by changes in functional connectivity. The overall aim of this study was to investigate whether easy-to-calculate graph theory-based summaries of brain network functional connectivity can discriminate between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomes. To further substantiate these results, we used the Louvain algorithm to detect the community structure of each TBI patient, to assess whether it differs from that of healthy individuals. We performed fMRI on 44 TBI patients who were admitted to the neurocritical care unit. Long-term functional outcome was determined at 6-12 months using the Glasgow outcome scale (GOS), with GOS 1-3 being defined as an unfavorable outcome. Functional connectivity was measured using Pearson's correlation coefficient. We derived topographical summaries of brain network connectivity using graph theory. We computed the participation coefficient (PC) and the module degree z-score (MDZ) for each parcel in the cortical template of Thomas Yeo et al. (2011). As topographical summaries of the network parameters we used the median, maximum and standard deviation (SD) of PC and MDZ in each of the seven functional networks that are included in the cortical parcellation of Yeo et al. Age and sedative medications were used as nuisance regressors. Using multivariate logistic regression, we observed no statistically significant association between the topographical summaries of brain connectivity and the dichotomized GOS. Thus, although graph theoretical measures applied to brain network connectivity patterns have previously been reported to be associated with cognitive dysfunction, they appear to be unable to predict long-term functional outcomes in critically ill TBI patients. Similarly, the extent to which TBI patient's community structures differed from that of healthy individuals, measured using adjusted mutual information, was also not associated with the dichotomized GOS. In summary, our results suggest that Meso-scale graph theoretical analyses of rs-fMRI brain network connectivity patterns can be expected to perform poorly as a prognostic tool in critically ill TBI patients.

Indexed as

Functional magnetic resonance imagingGraph theoryPrognosticationTraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID40568040
PMCPMC12172832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.