Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568036›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology2025

Pathophysiology of anastomotic stricture following rectal anastomosis: Insights into mechanisms, risk factors, and preventive strategies.

Ahmet Yavuz, Hikmet Pehlevan-Özel, Mesut Tez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmet YavuzDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Türkiye.
Hikmet Pehlevan-ÖzelDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Türkiye.
Mesut TezDepartment of Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara 06800, Türkiye. mesuttez@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anastomotic stricture (AS) remains a significant complication following rectal anastomosis, with an incidence ranging from 5% to 30% depending on surgical technique, patient factors, and postoperative management. This review aims to elucidate the pathophysiology of AS, exploring the underlying mechanisms that contribute to its development, including ischemia, inflammation, fibrosis, and impaired healing. Key risk factors such as low anterior resection, preoperative radiotherapy, and anastomotic leakage are critically analyzed based on recent clinical and experimental evidence. The article synthesizes current insights into the molecular and cellular processes, such as excessive collagen deposition and myofibroblast activation, that drive stricture formation. Furthermore, preventive strategies, including optimized surgical techniques (

Indexed as

Anastomotic leakageAnastomotic strictureFibrosisInflammationIschemiaRadiotherapyRectal cancerSurgical technique

Identifiers

PMID40568036
PMCPMC12186131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.