Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568032›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and occupational health practice2025

Long working hours among hospital-employed obstetricians and gynecologists and associated factors: a comparative study based on a nationwide survey.

Masatoshi Ishikawa, Ryoma Seto, Michiko Oguro, Yoshino Sato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and occupational health practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Masatoshi IshikawaResearch Institute, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9855-3233
Ryoma SetoResearch Institute, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.
Michiko OguroResearch Institute, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshino SatoResearch Institute, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To elucidate the status of reduction in working hours following physician work-style reforms and factors associated with long working hours. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted among obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) working in hospitals. The survey elucidated actual working conditions, including working hours and number of out-of-hour (OOH) shifts. To identify factors associated with long working hours, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed, with ≥60 or ≥80 working hours per week as dependent variables and OB/GYNs attributes (sex, age, job position, hospital type by ownership, total number of hospital beds, and regional characteristics) as independent variables. Results: Questionnaires were sent to 1,170 hospitals. Valid responses were obtained from 1164 OB/GYNs at 423 hospitals (response rate: 36%): 26.0% worked ≥60 hours per week, a reduction from 58.1% in 2019 (equivalent to over 960 hours of overtime annually), 5.4% worked ≥80 hours per week, a reduction from 41.2% in 2019 (equivalent to over 1,920 hours of overtime annually); and 46.9% worked OOH shifts ≥5 times per month. Factors significantly associated with long working hours per week included male sex, resident position, teaching duty, and number of OOH shifts. Conclusions: Although the working hours of OB/GYNs have decreased because of physician work-style reforms initiated in 2019, long working hours persist. To ensure health of OB/GYNs and patient safety, it is necessary to actively promote physician work-style reforms and advance measures aimed at the centralization of medical resources and addressing their maldistribution.

Indexed as

gynecologistsJapankaroshiobstetriciansworking hourswork-style reform

Identifiers

PMID40568032
PMCPMC12188116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.