Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40568005›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Improved Detection of HIV-1 Drug Resistance With Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Comparative Study and Its Implications.

Xiaojie Yang, Chang Yan, Mengying Li, Xuelei Liang, Rui Sun, Wenhao Lv, Hanxi Zhang, Fengting Yu, Fujie Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaojie YangBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5878-6562
Chang YanBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8544-917X
Mengying LiBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7105-7425
Xuelei LiangBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8226-5795
Rui SunBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7431-7777
Wenhao LvBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0810-467X
Hanxi ZhangBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2193-9581
Fengting YuBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fujie ZhangBeijing Ditan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6386-9879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HIV drug resistance is a crucial factor in treatment failure. Sanger sequencing, the current gold standard for resistance testing, cannot detect low-abundance variants constituting <20% of the virus population. Although next-generation sequencing (NGS) offers higher sensitivity, it is susceptible to biases during the amplification stage, further reducing the proportion of low-abundance mutant sequences. This study aimed to evaluate the application of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) combined with Sanger sequencing and NGS in resistance monitoring, seeking a more efficient method for drug-resistant mutation detection. Methods: Samples from 106 participants with treatment failure were subjected to amplification by ddPCR and bulk polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Amplification was successful with both methods in 103 participants, and Sanger sequencing was subsequently performed on their samples. NGS was performed on 16 of these participants. The success rates of genotyping were compared across viral loads. Additionally, we analyzed the consistency of Sanger sequencing results, explored differences in NGS results, and examined the relationship between low-frequency drug-resistant mutations and patient prognosis. Results: The amplification success rate of ddPCR is 97.2% (103/106) and increases with higher viral loads. The phylogenetic analysis results indicate that the 2 amplification methods exhibit good consistency, with 99% (102/103) of the Conclusions: The combination of ddPCR and NGS detects more low-frequency variants and offers greater accuracy than conventional bulk PCR. Our ddPCR technology provides a more efficient method for HIV drug resistance testing.

Indexed as

droplet digital PCRdrug resistance mutationsHIVlow frequency

Identifiers

PMID40568005
PMCPMC12188199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.