Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Ceftriaxone in an Older Population: The PhASAge Study.
Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approach to subcutaneous infusions in primary care: Indications, practical considerations, acceptability, and tolerability.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Review
- Ceftriaxone's Multifaceted Neuroprotection in Parkinson's Disease: Preclinical Evidence and Implications for Drug Repurposing.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ceftriaxone is frequently administered subcutaneously in France, especially in older patients, although this practice is currently off-label. This work aims to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) and tolerance of ceftriaxone administered by intravenous and subcutaneous routes in older patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years receiving intravenous or subcutaneous ceftriaxone 1 g every 24 hours were included. Steady-state plasma concentrations of ceftriaxone were measured. Based on intravenous and subcutaneous ceftriaxone concentrations and 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), a population PK model was developed for probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis. Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results: Data from 47 patients (24 in subcutaneous and 23 in intravenous groups) were analyzed. No between-group difference was observed in demographic and biological characteristics, ceftriaxone trough concentrations, or AUC. Bioavailability of subcutaneous ceftriaxone was estimated at 99% by population modeling. The PTA associated with subcutaneous administration were similar to or slightly better than that of the intravenous route. A dosing regimen of 1 or 2 g every 24 hours was associated with acceptable PTA and a low risk of overexposure in patients with normal or moderately altered renal function. Tolerance was assessed on 149 infusions (67 intravenous and 82 subcutaneous). One local AE (1.5%) was reported in the intravenous group versus 11 local AEs (mainly edema) in the subcutaneous group (13%), all transient and nonsevere. Conclusions: Subcutaneous administration of ceftriaxone was associated with PK/PD and dosage requirements comparable to those of intravenous administration, supporting the use of subcutaneous ceftriaxone in older patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.