Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567999›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Pharmacokinetics of Subcutaneous and Intravenous Ceftriaxone in an Older Population: The PhASAge Study.

Claire Roubaud-Baudron, Héloïse Fauchon, Françoise Stanke-Labesque, Marc Paccalin, Dominique Breilh, Nicolas Grégoire, Emmanuel Forestier, Tristan Ferry, Gaëtan Gavazzi, Sylvain Goutelle and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Claire Roubaud-BaudronCHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Gérontologie Clinique, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-0979
Héloïse FauchonLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7418-4646
Françoise Stanke-LabesqueHP2 INSERM U1300, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Marc PaccalinCHU Poitiers, INSERM, Clinical Investigation Center CIC1402, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Dominique BreilhLaboratoire de Pharmacocinétique et de Pharmacie Clinique, INSERM U1034 Groupe PK/PD, Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3783-2797
Nicolas GrégoirePHAR2, INSERM U1070, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Emmanuel ForestierCentre Hospitalier Métropole Savoie, Service de Maladies Infectieuses, Chambéry, France.
Tristan FerryLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Gaëtan GavazziService de Gériatrie, CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sylvain GoutelleLaboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, UMR CNRS 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1853-2932
Infectiology and Geriatrics InterGroup (SPILF-SFGG GInGer)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Ceftriaxone is frequently administered subcutaneously in France, especially in older patients, although this practice is currently off-label. This work aims to describe the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) and tolerance of ceftriaxone administered by intravenous and subcutaneous routes in older patients. Methods: Patients aged ≥65 years receiving intravenous or subcutaneous ceftriaxone 1 g every 24 hours were included. Steady-state plasma concentrations of ceftriaxone were measured. Based on intravenous and subcutaneous ceftriaxone concentrations and 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), a population PK model was developed for probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis. Local and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected. Results: Data from 47 patients (24 in subcutaneous and 23 in intravenous groups) were analyzed. No between-group difference was observed in demographic and biological characteristics, ceftriaxone trough concentrations, or AUC. Bioavailability of subcutaneous ceftriaxone was estimated at 99% by population modeling. The PTA associated with subcutaneous administration were similar to or slightly better than that of the intravenous route. A dosing regimen of 1 or 2 g every 24 hours was associated with acceptable PTA and a low risk of overexposure in patients with normal or moderately altered renal function. Tolerance was assessed on 149 infusions (67 intravenous and 82 subcutaneous). One local AE (1.5%) was reported in the intravenous group versus 11 local AEs (mainly edema) in the subcutaneous group (13%), all transient and nonsevere. Conclusions: Subcutaneous administration of ceftriaxone was associated with PK/PD and dosage requirements comparable to those of intravenous administration, supporting the use of subcutaneous ceftriaxone in older patients.

Indexed as

ceftriaxoneolder adultspharmacokineticssubcutaneoustolerance

Identifiers

PMID40567999
PMCPMC12188194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.