ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Construction and evaluation of an integrated "Hospital-Community-Family" public cardiopulmonary resuscitation training system.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Epidemiological investigations have found that 80% of cardiac arrest (CA) events occur in public places or homes. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is the most significant factor for out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) survival. Limited opportunities exist for community residents and family members of patients with chronic diseases to participate in CPR training programs. This study establishes an integrated "Hospital-Community-Family" public CPR training system and assesses its training feasibility. Methods: Training system construction: the integrated "Hospital-Community-Family" public CPR training system included three levels members and two steps. The three levels members were emergency physicians at level A tertiary hospital, general practitioners (GPs) from community health service centers, and family members of patients with chronic diseases. Two steps included: (1) GPs receiving public CPR training by emergency physicians, passing the examination, and obtaining American Heart Association (AHA) certificate; (2) family members of patients with chronic diseases receiving CPR training from GPs in community health service centers. Training feasibility assessment: a questionnaire survey was used to investigate the CPR knowledge and cognition of family members of chronic disease patients before, after and 6 months after training. Results: Construction of the integrated "Hospital-Community-Family" public CPR training system involved eight trainers certified in American Heart Association (AHA) CPR training from the level A tertiary hospital, 23 general practitioners from the community who completed the AHA training and obtained certificates, and 149 family members of patients with chronic diseases under community care who received training. Training feasibility assessment was conducted of family members before, immediately after and 6 months post training, yielding mean scores of 9.83 ± 4.11, 13.97 ± 2.87, and 13.02 ± 3.12 (out of a total score of 17), respectively. The differences were statistically significant ( Conclusions: The proposed integrated "Hospital-Community-Family" public CPR training system demonstrated significant acceptability, practical feasibility, and the necessity for its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.