ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Public mental health stigma and suicide rates across Europe.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating new opportunities to combat stigma in healthcare through a "universal" approach: findings from a longitudinal study of healthcare workers in Mombasa, Kenya.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Multivariate Patterns in Mental Health Burden and Psychiatric Resource Allocation in Europe: A Principal Component Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Psychosocial Determinants of Antidepressant Adherence Among Hungarian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- The mediating effect of serum cortisol between stigma and post-stroke depression in stroke patients.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mental health stigma remains a significant public health concern, particularly due to its complex relationship with suicide risk. While the two phenomena appear to be closely connected, inconsistencies in stigma measurement and a lack of standardized instruments complicate efforts to fully understand its role in suicide occurrence and prevention. Methods: We analyzed stigma measures from the 2022 and 2023 Eurobarometer surveys, alongside suicide rates and socio-economic indicators for 27 European Union countries. Correlational analyses and hierarchical linear regression models were employed to assess the relationships between stigma-associated variables and national suicide rates. Results: Our analysis revealed a notable decline in suicide rates between 2010 and 2019, with only four countries reporting increases. We found multiple negative associations between suicide rates and stigma measures, notably for the belief that disclosing a mental health condition would negatively impact one's career. Hierarchical linear regression models supported this item as a significant predictor of lower suicide rates. Discussion: The findings underscore the need for more systematic, theory-driven approaches to stigma assessment, as inconsistencies in survey items and temporal mismatches between stigma and suicide data hinder efforts to draw conclusive inferences. By employing robust measurement tools and systematic surveillance of mental health attitudes on a multinational scale, future research can better illuminate the complex interplay between stigma and suicidal behavior, ultimately enhancing our efforts toward suicide prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.