ReviewFrontiers in psychology2025
Is social identity theory enough to cover sports fans' behavior?: additional perspective from identity fusion theory.
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling Dropout Intentions in Sports Teams: Coach-Athlete and Peer Motivational Interdependence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Psychoeducational Intervention for Sedentary Overweight Adults Who Are Fans of a Football Club: Protocol for a Pragmatic Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- One sport, one family: negotiating inclusion, identity, and difference in national sports organizations.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper investigates the applicability of identity fusion theory (IFT) in explaining sports fan behaviors, highlighting its advantages over traditional frameworks such as social identity theory (SIT) and role identity theory (RIT). While SIT and RIT provide significant insights into group identification and role-based behavior, they fall short in addressing the profound emotional and relational dimensions of sports fandom. These limitations are particularly evident in contexts involving extreme loyalty, self-sacrificial actions, and the deep personal connections fans form with their teams and fellow supporters. IFT bridges these gaps by positing that personal and group identities can merge, creating a powerful motivational force that drives fans to prioritize the group's welfare as their own. This paper explores how IFT's dual focus on relational and collective ties offers a more nuanced understanding of fan loyalty, pro-group behavior, and the intense emotional investment characteristic of sports fandom. By examining the interplay of these ties, this paper provides theoretical and practical implications for advancing research on fan engagement and loyalty. The findings suggest that IFT not only complements but extends the explanatory power of SIT and RIT, offering a comprehensive framework for understanding the unique dynamics of sports fandom.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.