Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567876›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

A path to resilience and social integration: motivations of international student volunteers during the COVID-19 lockdown in Wuhan.

Meraj Malakouti, Asma Khaleel Abdallah, Ahmed Alkaabi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Meraj MalakoutiCollege of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Asma Khaleel AbdallahSharjah Education Academy, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed AlkaabiCollege of Education, United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic emerged globally, resulting in the shutdown of schools and universities. The January 2020 lockdown in Wuhan, China, profoundly impacted residents' daily lives, particularly international students who faced restrictions within their campuses and dormitories. This qualitative study aimed to investigate the motivations of international student volunteers during Wuhan's COVID-19 lockdown and identify how this voluntary activity fostered resilience and social integration among them. Methods: The study adopts a qualitative approach using semi-structured in-depth interviews with 14 international PhD students at a university in China who volunteered during the three-month Wuhan lockdown. Data saturation was achieved through purposeful sampling. Data were transcribed, and thematic analysis was applied, with coding using NVivo 14. Results: After applying thematic analysis, three key themes were identified: (a) motivation for volunteering, (b) resilience through volunteering, and (c) social integration and community bonding through volunteering. These themes were explored in relation to the psychological needs defined in Self-Determination Theory. Discussion: Our findings further indicate that coping via volunteering not only enhanced psychological resilience but also significantly facilitated social connections among culturally diverse groups. These findings highlight the importance of understanding volunteer motivations and experiences, providing valuable insights for universities and policymakers to develop strategies that enhance student support and community resilience during a crisis.

Indexed as

COVID-19 lockdownmotivationsresiliencesocial integrationvolunteering

Identifiers

PMID40567876
PMCPMC12188544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.