Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567867›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021

Resting-state functional connectivity in the attention networks is not altered by offline theta-burst stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex or the temporo-parietal junction as compared to a vertex control site.

Björn Machner, Jonathan Imholz, Lara Braun, Philipp J Koch, Tobias Bäumer, Thomas F Münte, Christoph Helmchen, Andreas Sprenger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Björn MachnerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Jonathan ImholzDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Lara BraunDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Philipp J KochDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Tobias BäumerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Thomas F MünteDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Christoph HelmchenDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Andreas SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disruption of resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) between core regions of the dorsal attention network (DAN), including the bilateral superior parietal lobule (SPL), and structural damage of the right-lateralized ventral attention network (VAN), including the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), have been described as neural basis for hemispatial neglect. Pursuing a virtual lesion model, we aimed to perturbate the attention networks of 22 healthy subjects by applying continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) to the right SPL or TPJ. We first created network masks of the DAN and VAN based on RSFC analyses from a RS-fMRI baseline session and determined the SPL and TPJ stimulation site within the respective mask. We then performed RS-fMRI immediately after cTBS of the SPL, TPJ (active sites) or vertex (control site). RSFC between SPL/TPJ and whole brain as well as between predefined regions of interest (ROI) in the attention networks was analyzed in a within-subject design. Contrary to our hypothesis, seed-based RSFC did not differ between the four experimental conditions. The individual change in ROI-to-ROI RSFC from baseline to post-stimulation did also not differ between active (SPL, TPJ) and control (vertex) cTBS. In our study, a single session offline cTBS over the right SPL or TPJ could not alter RSFC in the attention networks as compared to a control stimulation, maybe because effects wore off too early. Future studies should consider a modified cTBS protocol, concurrent TMS-fMRI or transcranial direct current stimulation.

Indexed as

fMRIFunctional networksNeglectSpatial attentionTMS

Identifiers

PMID40567867
PMCPMC12172914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.