ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021
Breath holding for 20 s following extended expiration is a practical, effective and robust standard when measuring cerebrovascular reactivity in healthy adults using BOLD fMRI at 3 T.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elevated carbon dioxide in exhaled breath induces false-positive DOB results during Helicobacter pylori detection with ¹³C-urea breath test using infrared spectroscopy.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026Review
- Using respiratory challenges to modulate CSF movement across different physiological pathways: An fMRI study.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Enhancing diffuse correlation spectroscopy pulsatile cerebral blood flow signal with near-infrared spectroscopy photoplethysmography.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Portable, high speed blood flow measurements enabled by long wavelength, interferometric diffuse correlation spectroscopy (LW-iDCS).Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: BOLD fMRI is becoming the preferred modality to study cerebrovascular reactivity. Amongst the vasoactive stimuli to induce it, breath holding is considered equal to other methods but both cerebrovascular reserve measures and breath holding designs lack standardization. We have systematically considered whether breath holding paradigms at short time periods are both a practical as well as equally effective and robust alternative to the elaborate CO Subjects Materials and Methods: Using BOLD fMRI, eleven healthy subjects were examined with dynamic T2*-weighted echo planar imaging at 3 T. Cerebrovascular reactivity was measured during episodes of breath holding for 10 s and 20 s, both after deep inspiration and after extended expiration, and compared to the reactivity following inhalation of an air mixture with 5% CO Results: 20 s breath holding challenges yielded higher reactivities represented by corresponding higher BOLD-signal changes when compared to 10 s ones, as did expiratory paradigms when compared to inspiratory ones. Mean signal changes ranged from 2% (10 s breath holding after inspiration) to 3% (20 s breath holding after expiration). The CO Conclusion: The breath holding tasks evoked BOLD-signal increases which compare favorably to published data. A 20 s breath holding period appears to be ideal and is tolerated well. This experimental design is thus practical, effective and robust. To further standardize the breath holding design and the measurement of cerebrovascular reserve, controlled breathing during resting periods as well as modelling of the fMRI-signal to end-tidal CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.