Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567865›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2021

Breath holding for 20 s following extended expiration is a practical, effective and robust standard when measuring cerebrovascular reactivity in healthy adults using BOLD fMRI at 3 T.

Jörg Larsen, Kai Kallenberg, Johanna Rühlmann, Jürgen Baudewig, Eike A Nickel, Michael Knauth, Peter Dechent

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cerebrovascular reactivity delay measured by blood oxygen level dependent magnetic resonance imaging and gas challenges: A systematic review.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jörg LarsenDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Universitymedicine Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.
Kai KallenbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Klinikum Fulda, Fulda, Germany.
Johanna RühlmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, St. Joseph-Stift, Bremen, Germany.
Jürgen BaudewigDepartment of Functional Imaging, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany.
Eike A NickelDepartment of Anesthesiology, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Berlin, Germany.
Michael KnauthPraxis für Moderne Schnittbild Diagnostik, Göttingen, Germany.
Peter DechentMR-Research in Neurosciences, Cognitive Neurology, Universitymedicine Göttingen, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: BOLD fMRI is becoming the preferred modality to study cerebrovascular reactivity. Amongst the vasoactive stimuli to induce it, breath holding is considered equal to other methods but both cerebrovascular reserve measures and breath holding designs lack standardization. We have systematically considered whether breath holding paradigms at short time periods are both a practical as well as equally effective and robust alternative to the elaborate CO Subjects Materials and Methods: Using BOLD fMRI, eleven healthy subjects were examined with dynamic T2*-weighted echo planar imaging at 3 T. Cerebrovascular reactivity was measured during episodes of breath holding for 10 s and 20 s, both after deep inspiration and after extended expiration, and compared to the reactivity following inhalation of an air mixture with 5% CO Results: 20 s breath holding challenges yielded higher reactivities represented by corresponding higher BOLD-signal changes when compared to 10 s ones, as did expiratory paradigms when compared to inspiratory ones. Mean signal changes ranged from 2% (10 s breath holding after inspiration) to 3% (20 s breath holding after expiration). The CO Conclusion: The breath holding tasks evoked BOLD-signal increases which compare favorably to published data. A 20 s breath holding period appears to be ideal and is tolerated well. This experimental design is thus practical, effective and robust. To further standardize the breath holding design and the measurement of cerebrovascular reserve, controlled breathing during resting periods as well as modelling of the fMRI-signal to end-tidal CO

Indexed as

BrainBreath holdingCerebrovascular reactivityFunctional MRIHypercapniaStandardization

Identifiers

PMID40567865
PMCPMC12172711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.