ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2025
A Retrospective Study on the Effect of STA Anesthesia Technique in the Extraction of Impacted Teeth in Dental Outpatients and Its Impact on Patient Anxiety Levels.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the effect of the Single Tooth Anesthesia (STA) technique in dental outpatient patients undergoing the extraction of impacted teeth and its impact on patient anxiety levels. Methods: This retrospective study included clinical data from 130 patients who underwent the extraction of a single mandibular impacted tooth in our dental outpatient department between April 2022 and June 2024. According to the anesthesia method, patients were divided into two groups: the Traditional Group (n = 65, receiving traditional local injection anesthesia) and the STA Group (n = 65, receiving Single Tooth Anesthesia). Parameters including intraoperative bleeding, duration of anesthesia, extent of anesthetic infiltration, blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], heart rate (HR), pain [visual analog scale (VAS)], compliance (Frankl treatment compliance scale), tolerance (Houpt behavior scale), and anxiety level [modified dental anxiety scale (MDAS)] were compared between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in the amount of bleeding, anesthesia duration, or infiltration range between the two groups (P > 0.05). In the Traditional Group, SBP at 3 minutes after anesthesia and post-extraction was significantly higher than before anesthesia (P < 0.05), whereas DBP and HR showed no significant changes (P > 0.05). In the STA Group, SBP, DBP, and HR remained stable across the three time points (P > 0.05). Compared with the Traditional Group, the STA Group showed significantly lower pain scores, reduced anxiety, and higher rates of treatment compliance and tolerance (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the STA anesthesia technique showed advantages over traditional local injection anesthesia in reducing pain and anxiety, while improving compliance and tolerance during impacted tooth extraction in dental outpatients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.