Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567848›Full record

ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2024

User Satisfaction with Technology-Enhanced Health Insurance among Community-Based Health Insurance Users: A Survey at one Selected Referral Hospital, Rwanda.

Ferdinand Maniriho Maombi, Erigene Rutayisire

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ferdinand Maniriho MaombiDepartment of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda.
Erigene RutayisireDepartment of Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Mount Kenya University, Kigali, Rwanda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Expanding health insurance coverage is crucial for improving access to healthcare services in Africa. While Rwanda has successfully implemented a community-based health insurance scheme (Mutuelle de Santé), the transition from traditional paperbased systems to Technology-based platforms presents a new challenge. Understanding user satisfaction with these new platforms is critical for their long-term success. Objective: This study seeks to investigate the satisfaction level of community health insurance users attending the Outpatient Department at One selected Referral Hospital in Rwanda. Methods: The mixed-methods study used an explanatory sequential design among 384 Community Based Health Insurance (CBHI) users. A structured questionnaire used for data collection; Analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences Version 21. Results: The majority of participants (81.3%) expressed satisfaction. Young participants aged <20 years (AOR:1.96, 95% CI:1.037-2.718, p=0.003) Young participants are very satisfied. Limited medication availability and internet reliance hindered user experience. Healthcare providers faced increased workload from managing patient files and the CBHI system. Improved payment processes and patient verification streamlined billing, saving time and reducing errors. Conclusion: The findings indicate a generally positive satisfaction and factors such as age, education, marital status, occupation, health insurance, and presence of under 5 children were found to be associated with satisfaction levels.

Indexed as

Community Health InsuranceReferral HospitalRwandaTechnology-based health insuranceUser Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID40567848
PMCPMC12110552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.