ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
TASCI: transformers for aspect-based sentiment analysis with contextual intent integration.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supervised attention method with co-reference resolution for aspect extraction.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- EAC-Agent: A deep learning framework for multimodal emotion-aware conversational agent with contextual response generation.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, we present a novel Transformer-Based Aspect-Level Sentiment Classification with Intent (TASCI) model, designed to enhance sentiment analysis by integrating aspect-level sentiment classification with intent analysis. Traditional sentiment analysis methods often overlook the nuanced relationship between the intent behind a statement and the sentiment expressed toward specific aspects of an entity. TASCI addresses this gap by first extracting aspects using a self-attention mechanism and then employing a Transformer-based model to infer the speaker's intent from preceding sentences. This dual approach allows TASCI to contextualize sentiment analysis, providing a more accurate reflection of user opinions. We validate TASCI's performance on three benchmark datasets: Restaurant, Laptop, and Twitter, achieving state-of-the-art results with an accuracy of 89.10% and a macro-F1 score of 83.38% on the Restaurant dataset, 84.81% accuracy and 78.63% macro-F1 score on the Laptop dataset, and 79.08% accuracy and 77.27% macro-F1 score on the Twitter dataset. These results demonstrate that incorporating intent analysis significantly enhances the model's ability to capture complex sentiment expressions across different domains, thereby setting a new standard for aspect-level sentiment classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.