ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
An adaptive fusion-based data augmentation method for abstract dialogue summarization.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dialogue summarization is necessary for information retrieval, and the training of abstract dialogue summarization models heavily rely on large amounts of labeled data. However, manual summarization of long dialogue is labor-costing and time-consuming. To solve this problem, this article proposes a data augmentation method for dialogue summary based on adaptive augmentation fusion (AAF), integrating the strengths of both Minor Perturbation Augmentation (MPA) and Semantic Reconstructive Augmentation (SRA) to balance model learning effectiveness and generalization capabilities. We first integrated existing enhancement methods to address the problem of insufficient annotated data for dialogue summarization. The experimental results on both the DialogSum and SAMSum datasets demonstrate that the AAF method achieves significant improvements in ROUGE scores under resource-constrained conditions, outperforming baseline approaches. Furthermore, it was validated that the selection of the amount of augmented data has a significant impact on model training results under resource-constrained conditions. We have publically released our code at https://github.com/alolke/AAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.