Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567801›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Towards interpretable drug interaction prediction

Rongpei Li, Yufang Zhang, Heqi Sun, Shenggeng Lin, Guihua Jia, Yitian Fang, Chen Zhang, Xiaotong Song, Jianwei Zhao, Lyubin Hu and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Rongpei LiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yufang ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Heqi SunState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Shenggeng LinState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Guihua JiaState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9967-3162
Yitian FangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Chen ZhangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0005-8396-9398
Xiaotong SongState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jianwei ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Lyubin HuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yajing YuanState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xueying MaoState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jiayi LiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Aman KaushikState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Dandan AnZhongjing Research and Industrialization Institute of Chinese Medicine, Henan, China.
Dongqing WeiState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic & Developmental Sciences and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) account for 17-23% of adverse drug reactions leading to hospitalization, with over 74,000 DDI-related events reported in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) during 2023. While recent computational methods focus on improving prediction accuracy, they suffer from high false-positive rates (>45%) and often function as black-box models without biological interpretability. Methods: We propose Dual-stage attention and Bayesian calibration with active learning Drug-Drug Interaction (DABI-DDI), a novel framework integrating: (1) A dual-stage attention mechanism with LSTM networks for capturing temporal dependencies in drug interactions, (2) a Bayesian calibration approach with beta-binomial modeling for refining interaction signals and reducing false positives, (3) an active learning strategy for efficient sample selection, and (4) a network pharmacology component linking drug interactions to underlying biological mechanisms. The model was validated using data from FAERS, DrugBank, and STRING databases, with comprehensive evaluation on both computational performance and biological interpretability. Results: DABI-DDI achieved superior performance (AUC = 0.947, PR_AUC = 0.944). Bayesian calibration improved adverse event detection accuracy (94% Conclusion: We present DABI-DDI, an integrated feature extraction framework that successfully addresses key challenges in DDIs prediction through three major innovations: Temporal pattern recognition, reducing false positives, and biological interpretability. Most importantly, the framework demonstrates strong clinical applicability by efficiently identifying high-risk drug combinations while providing mechanistic insights through enzyme-transporter pathway analysis. This approach bridges the gap between computational prediction and clinical understanding, offering a promising tool for safer drug combination therapy.

Indexed as

Active learningBayesian calibrationDrug-drug interactionsDual-stage attention networksLSTM networksNetwork pharmacology

Identifiers

PMID40567801
PMCPMC12192666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.