ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
TARGE: large language model-powered explainable hate speech detection.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of user-generated content on social networking sites has intensified the challenge of accurately and efficiently detecting inflammatory and discriminatory speech at scale. Traditional manual moderation methods are impractical due to the sheer volume and complexity of online discourse, necessitating automated solutions. However, existing deep learning models for hate speech detection typically function as black-box systems, providing binary classifications without interpretable insights into their decision-making processes. This opacity significantly limits their practical utility, particularly in nuanced content moderation tasks. To address this challenge, our research explores leveraging the advanced reasoning and knowledge integration capabilities of state-of-the-art language models, specifically Mistral-7B, to develop transparent hate speech detection systems. We introduce a novel framework wherein large language models (LLMs) generate explicit rationales by identifying and analyzing critical textual features indicative of hate speech. These rationales are subsequently integrated into specialized classifiers designed to perform explainable content moderation. We rigorously evaluate our methodology on multiple benchmark English-language social media datasets. Results demonstrate that incorporating LLM-generated explanations significantly enhances both the interpretability and accuracy of hate speech detection. This approach not only identifies problematic content effectively but also clearly articulates the analytical rationale behind each decision, fulfilling the critical demand for transparency in automated content moderation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.