Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567781›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Designing a novel technique for evaluation of tourism informatization in scenic spots from a big data perspective.

Li Fu, Yao Yi, Lina Liu, Ran Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Li FuDepartment of Management, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong City, China.
Yao YiDepartment of Management, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong City, China.
Lina LiuDepartment of Management, Taiyuan Normal University, Jinzhong City, China.
Ran ChenDepartment of Tourism Management, Binzhou University, Binzhou City, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, tourism has become a significant driver of many countries' economies. To maximize revenue from tourism, it is crucial to prioritize the effective management of scenic spots and tourist attractions, and also raise awareness about these places. Social media platforms have played a pivotal role in promoting tourism, as users frequently share videos and reviews related to tourism. Analyzing and managing these reviews is essential for understanding tourists' opinions about specific destinations. In this study, we evaluated a scenic spot by analyzing tourists' sentiments. Data was collected from popular social media sites such as TripAdvisor and Twitter using web scraping and the Twitter API. The raw data was preprocessed to remove irrelevant information and redundancies and was properly annotated for further processing. We applied two approaches to analyze the sentiments of tourists. First, we vectorized the text representing the sentiment using the term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) and utilized big data analytics to extract meaningful insights. Secondly, we employed a pre-trained large language model, bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), with a linear classifier to classify tourists' sentiments. The results of the big data analytics approaches were compared with those of BERT and previously proposed methods. BERT outperformed other machine learning models, achieving an average accuracy of 83.5% on the test set. These insights are valuable for evaluating the informatization of tourist spots, destination management, hospitality, and overall tourist attractions.

Indexed as

BERTBig dataData securityMachine learningNeural networksTourism informatizationTourist sentiment analysis

Identifiers

PMID40567781
PMCPMC12190376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.