ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Deep ensemble learning for gastrointestinal diagnosis using endoscopic image classification.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal endoscopic image classification using a hybrid modified inception network and a customized vision transformer with tree growth feature selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A hybrid ViT-L/32-MaxViT-L architecture with adaptive gated fusion for multiclass gastrointestinal disease detection and multi-methodFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Machine learning in gastrointestinal endoscopy: challenges and opportunities.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Review
- EndoNet: A Multiscale Deep Learning Framework for Multiple Gastrointestinal Disease Classification via Endoscopic Images.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfer learning is a valuable tool for the effective assistance of gastroenterologists in the powerful diagnosis of medical images with fast convergence. It also intends to minimize the time and estimated effort required for improved gastrointestinal tract (GIT) diagnosis. GIT abnormalities are widely known to be fatal disorders leading to significant mortalities. It includes both upper and lower GIT disorders. The challenges of addressing GIT issues are complex and need significant study. Multiple challenges exist regarding computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) and endoscopy including a lack of annotated images, dark backgrounds, less contrast, noisy backgrounds, and irregular patterns. Deep learning and transfer learning have assisted gastroenterologists in effective diagnosis in various ways. The goal of proposed framework is the effective classification of endoscopic GIT images with enhanced accuracy. The proposed research aims to formulate a transfer learning-based deep ensemble model, accurately classifying GIT disorders for therapeutic purposes. The proposed model is based on weighted voting ensemble of the two state-of-the-art (STA) base models, NasNet-Mobile and EfficientNet. The extraction of regions of interest, specifically the sick portions, have been performed using images captured from endoscopic procedure. Performance evaluation of the proposed model is performed with cross-dataset evaluation. The datasets utilized include the training dataset HyperKvasir and two test datasets, Kvasir v1 and Kvasir v2. However, the dataset alone cannot create a robust model due to the unequal distribution of images across categories, making transfer learning a promising approach for model development. The evaluation of the proposed framework has been conducted by cross-dataset evaluation utilizing accuracy, precision, recall, Area under curve (AUC) score and F1 score performance metrics. The proposed work outperforms much of the existing transfer learning-based models giving 97.83% on Kvasir v1 and 98.45% accuracy on Kvasir v2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.