ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
A novel user-centric happiness model for personalized tour recommendations.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel personalized tour recommendation model, the Happiness Model (HM), is presented. The HM optimizes itineraries by considering traveler satisfaction as a function of time and maximizing it over the trip duration. The model integrates the Item Constraints Data Model (ICDM) to reduce data dimensionality and search space. By considering various activities within different points of interest (POIs) and minimizing wasted time, the HM overcomes the limitations of existing methods. Unlike existing POI-centric models, the HM is time-centric, creating tour recommendations that maximize user satisfaction throughout the trip. Experimental results demonstrate the model's effectiveness in generating personalized tour recommendations aligned with user preferences. The HM achieves an average satisfaction score of 0.85 across multiple datasets, outperforming traditional models such as the Time-Dependent Orienteering Problem with Time Windows (TOPTW), which achieves an average score of 0.72. Additionally, the HM reduces waiting times by 30% and increases the number of recommended POIs by 20% compared to existing methods. These results highlight the HM's ability to provide more efficient and enjoyable travel experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.