Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567760›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Linear B-cell epitope prediction for SARS and COVID-19 vaccine design: Integrating balanced ensemble learning models and resampling strategies.

Fatih Gurcan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Fatih GurcanDepartment of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive machine learning framework to enhance the prediction accuracy of B-cell epitopes and antibody recognition related to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). To address the issue of data imbalance, various resampling techniques were applied using three types of strategies: over-sampling, under-sampling, and hybrid-sampling. The implemented resampling methods were designed to improve class balance and enhance model training. The rebalanced datasets were then used in model building with ensemble classifiers employing Boosting, Bagging, and Balancing strategies. Hyperparameter optimization for the classifiers was conducted using GridSearchCV, while feature selection was performed with the recursive feature elimination (RFE) algorithm. Model performance was evaluated using seven different metrics: Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC), precision recall area under the curve (PR AUC), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). Furthermore, statistical significance analyses including paired t-test, Wilcoxon, and permutation tests confirmed the reliability of the model improvements. To interpret the model's predictive behavior, peptides with the highest confidence among correctly classified instances were identified as potential epitope candidates. The results indicate that the combination of Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique-Edited Nearest Neighbors (SMOTE-ENN), and ExtraTrees yielded the best performance, achieving an ROC AUC score of 0.9899. The combination of Instance Hardness Threshold (IHT) and ExtraTrees followed closely with a score of 0.9799. These findings emphasize the effectiveness of integrating resampling models and balancing ensemble classifiers in improving the accuracy of B-cell epitope prediction and antibody recognition for SARS and COVID-19 infections. This study contributes to vaccine development efforts and the advancement of immunoinformatics research by identifying promising epitope candidates.

Indexed as

B-cell epitope predictionEnsemble learningImmunoinformaticsResampling techniquesVaccine design

Identifiers

PMID40567760
PMCPMC12193457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.