Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567759›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare: advancing older adults' health management in Saudi Arabia through AI-powered chatbots.

Sabah Abdullah Al-Somali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sabah Abdullah Al-SomaliManagement Information System Department, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-4994-8241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The healthcare sector is experiencing rapid digital advancements, with patients increasingly seeking quick and seamless interactions. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven healthcare chatbots are becoming an integral part of elderly care, transforming provider-patient engagement and supporting health behavior goals tailored to individual preferences, needs, and limitations. Methods: This study developed a comprehensive research framework incorporating various theoretical perspectives to explore the determinants of sustained use of AI-powered healthcare chatbots among older adults. The framework also examined the mediating influence of perceived humanness. The model was evaluated using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) on cross-sectional data collected from 158 individuals aged 60 and above. Results: The findings show that satisfaction with AI-powered chatbots is significantly influenced by facilitating conditions, perceived hedonic motivation, confirmation, performance expectancy, and effort expectancy. Perceived security also plays a critical role in shaping satisfaction and the intention to continue using these chatbots. Moreover, the analysis revealed that perceived humanness mediates the relationship between satisfaction and continuous use intentions among elderly users in Saudi Arabia. Discussion: This research provides valuable insights into the factors influencing older adults' acceptance of AI chatbots in Saudi Arabia, particularly in the post-COVID-19 era. These findings enrich academic discourse and offer actionable recommendations for healthcare organizations adapting to the evolving digital landscape.

Indexed as

AI-powered chatbotsArtificial intelligence (AI)Continuous use intentionsExpectancy confirmation theoryHealth managementOlder adultsPerceived humannessSatisfactionSaudi ArabiaUTAUT model

Identifiers

PMID40567759
PMCPMC12190517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.