Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567756›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

High-fidelity steganography in EEG signals using advanced transform-based methods.

Enes Efe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Enes EfeDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6136-6140

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of digital health solutions and smart health devices (SHDs) ensures the continuity of personal biometric data while simultaneously raising concerns about their security and privacy. Consequently, the development of novel encryption techniques and data protection policies is crucial to comply with regulations such as The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and to safeguard against cyber threats. This study introduces a robust and efficient method for embedding private information into electroencephalogram (EEG) signals by employing the stationary wavelet transform (SWT), singular value decomposition (SVD), and tent map techniques. The proposed approach aims to increase embedding capacity while maintaining signal integrity, ensuring resilience against various forms of distortion, and achieving computational efficiency. Experiments were conducted on three publicly available EEG datasets (Graz A, DEAP, and Bonn), and performance was evaluated using widely recognized metrics, including peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), percentage root mean square difference (PRD), normalized cross-correlation (NCC), bit error rate (BER), and Euclidean distance (ED). The results indicate that the method preserves perceptual quality, achieving PSNR values above 60 dB and demonstrating minimal signal distortion. Robustness tests involving noise addition, random cropping, and low-pass filtering confirm the method's high resilience, with BER approaching zero and NCC near unity. Moreover, the proposed method demonstrates significantly reduced hiding and extraction times compared to conventional approaches, enhancing its suitability for real-time, secure biomedical data transmission.

Indexed as

EEGSingular value decompositionStationary wavelet transformSteganographyTent map

Identifiers

PMID40567756
PMCPMC12192647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.