ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Optimization of multi-objective feature regression models for designing performance assessment methods in college and university educational reform.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The evaluation of teacher performance in higher education is a critical component of educational reform, requiring robust and accurate assessment methodologies. Multi-objective regression offers a promising approach to optimizing the construction of performance evaluation index systems. However, conventional regression models often rely on a shared input space for all targets, neglecting the fact that distinct and complex feature sets may influence each target. This study introduces a novel Multi-Objective Feature Regression model under Label-Specific Features (MOFR-LSF), which integrates target-specific features and inter-target correlations to address this limitation. By extending the single-objective stacking framework, the proposed method learns label-specific features for each target and employs cluster analysis on binned samples to uncover underlying correlations among objectives. Experimental evaluations on three datasets-Education Reform (EDU-REFORM), Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), and National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)-demonstrate the superior performance of MOFR-LSF, achieving relative root mean square error (RRMSE) values of 0.634, 0.332, and 0.925, respectively, outperforming existing multi-objective regression algorithms. The proposed model not only enhances predictive accuracy but also strengthens the scientific validity and fairness of performance evaluations, offering meaningful contributions to educational reform in colleges and universities. Moreover, its adaptable framework suggests potential applicability across a range of other domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.