ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Leveraging large language models for spelling correction in Turkish.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reconceptualizing Scoring Reliability Through Linguistic Similarity.Educational and psychological measurement · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of natural language processing (NLP) has rapidly progressed, particularly with the rise of large language models (LLMs), which enhance our understanding of the intrinsic structures of languages in a cross-linguistic manner for complex NLP tasks. However, commonly encountered misspellings in human-written texts adversely affect language understanding for LLMs for various NLP tasks as well as misspelling applications such as auto-proofreading and chatbots. Therefore, this study focuses on the task of spelling correction in the agglutinative language Turkish, where its nature makes spell correction significantly more challenging. To address this, the research introduces a novel dataset, referred to as NoisyWikiTr, to explore encoder-only models based on bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) and existing auto-correction tools. For the first time in this study, as far as is known, encoder-only models based on BERT are presented as subword prediction models, and encoder-decoder models based on text-cleaning (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) architecture are fine-tuned for this task in Turkish. A comprehensive comparison of these models highlights the advantages of context-based approaches over traditional, context-free auto-correction tools. The findings also reveal that among LLMs, a language-specific sequence-to-sequence model outperforms both cross-lingual sequence-to-sequence models and encoder-only models in handling realistic misspellings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.