Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567745›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Leveraging large language models for spelling correction in Turkish.

Ceren Guzel Turhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Reconceptualizing Scoring Reliability Through Linguistic Similarity.Educational and psychological measurement · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ceren Guzel TurhanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of natural language processing (NLP) has rapidly progressed, particularly with the rise of large language models (LLMs), which enhance our understanding of the intrinsic structures of languages in a cross-linguistic manner for complex NLP tasks. However, commonly encountered misspellings in human-written texts adversely affect language understanding for LLMs for various NLP tasks as well as misspelling applications such as auto-proofreading and chatbots. Therefore, this study focuses on the task of spelling correction in the agglutinative language Turkish, where its nature makes spell correction significantly more challenging. To address this, the research introduces a novel dataset, referred to as NoisyWikiTr, to explore encoder-only models based on bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) and existing auto-correction tools. For the first time in this study, as far as is known, encoder-only models based on BERT are presented as subword prediction models, and encoder-decoder models based on text-cleaning (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) architecture are fine-tuned for this task in Turkish. A comprehensive comparison of these models highlights the advantages of context-based approaches over traditional, context-free auto-correction tools. The findings also reveal that among LLMs, a language-specific sequence-to-sequence model outperforms both cross-lingual sequence-to-sequence models and encoder-only models in handling realistic misspellings.

Indexed as

Encoder-decoder sequence-to-sequence modelsEncoder-only LLMsMasked language modelingSpell checkSpell correction

Identifiers

PMID40567745
PMCPMC12192738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.