ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
SLPDBO-BP: an efficient valuation model for data asset value.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-Strategy Improved Connected Banking System Optimizer for Numerical Optimization and Real Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data asset value assessment is of strategic significance to the development of data factorization, in order to solve the problems of strong assessment subjectivity and low assessment efficiency and accuracy in traditional assessment methods. This article introduces the SLPDBO-BP data asset assessment model for data asset value assessment. Firstly, the sinusoidal chaos mapping strategy, the Levy flight strategy and the fusion of adaptive weight variation operators are integrated to increase the population diversity of the algorithm, broaden the search range, and augment the global optimization capability of the algorithm. Secondly, in an attempt to comprehensively evaluate the optimization performance of SLPDBO, a series of numerical optimization experiments are carried out with 20 test functions and with popular optimization algorithms and dung beetle optimizer (DBO) algorithms with different improvement strategies. Finally, in order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in data asset value assessment, the SLPDBO algorithm is combined with backpropagation (BP) to establish the SLPDBO-BP model for data asset value assessment, and the acquired data sets are used in the proposed model for data asset value assessment. The experimental results show that the SLPDBO-BP model performs well in assessment accuracy, and its assessment indexes mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) are reduced by 35.1%, 37.6% and 38.7%, respectively, compared with the dung beetle optimizer backpropagation (DBO-BP) model, and its evaluation efficiency is improved, and the proposed model demonstrates better evaluation simulation effects by remarkably outperforming other models in terms of evaluation accuracy and error level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.