ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Federated learning with LSTM for intrusion detection in IoT-based wireless sensor networks: a multi-dataset analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Intrusion and Anomaly Detection for IoT Sensor Networks Using Hybrid Feature Selection and Deep Autoencoder Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Privacy-Preserving Federated Deep Learning for Robust Anomaly Detection in Distributed Security Sensing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Federated learning with LSTM for intrusion detection in IoT-based wireless sensor networks: a multi-dataset analysis.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- A triple-layer authentication framework with elliptic curve cryptography for securing IoT-assisted wireless sensor networks.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrusion detection in Internet of Things (IoT)-based wireless sensor networks (WSNs) is essential due to their widespread use and inherent vulnerability to security breaches. Traditional centralized intrusion detection systems (IDS) face significant challenges in data privacy, computational efficiency, and scalability, particularly in resource-constrained IoT environments. This study aims to create and assess a federated learning (FL) framework that integrates with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for efficient intrusion detection in IoT-based WSNs. We design the framework to enhance detection accuracy, minimize false positive rates (FPR), and ensure data privacy, while maintaining system scalability. Using an FL approach, multiple IoT nodes collaboratively train a global LSTM model without exchanging raw data, thereby addressing privacy concerns and improving detection capabilities. The proposed model was tested on three widely used datasets: WSN-DS, CIC-IDS-2017, and UNSW-NB15. The evaluation metrics for its performance included accuracy, F1 score, FPR, and root mean square error (RMSE). We evaluated the performance of the FL-based LSTM model against traditional centralized models, finding significant improvements in intrusion detection. The FL-based LSTM model achieved higher accuracy and a lower FPR across all datasets than centralized models. It effectively managed sequential data in WSNs, ensuring data privacy while maintaining competitive performance, particularly in complex attack scenarios. FL and LSTM networks work well together to make a strong way to find intrusions in IoT-based WSNs, which improves both privacy and detection. This study underscores the potential of FL-based systems to address key challenges in IoT security, including data privacy, scalability, and performance, making the proposed framework suitable for real-world IoT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.