ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Proto-Caps: interpretable medical image classification using prototype learning and privileged information.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An intelligent lung nodule classification model using 3D Trans-DenseUnet++-based lung nodule segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FAIR4prep: FAIR clinical informatics data preprocessing in artificial intelligence applications.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Review
- A structure-aware and causal-invariant framework for glioma cell classification in pathological images.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- AdaptPest-Net: A Task-Adaptive Network with Graph-Mamba Fusion for Multi-Scale Agricultural Pest Recognition.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Proto-Caps: interpretable medical image classification using prototype learning and privileged information.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) is becoming increasingly important as the need for understanding the model's reasoning grows when applying them in high-risk areas. This is especially crucial in the field of medicine, where decision support systems are utilised to make diagnoses or to determine appropriate therapies. Here it is essential to provide intuitive and comprehensive explanations to evaluate the system's correctness. To meet this need, we have developed Proto-Caps, an intrinsically explainable model for image classification. It explains its decisions by providing visual prototypes that resemble specific appearance features. These characteristics are predefined by humans, which on the one hand makes them understandable and on the other hand leads to the model basing its decision on the same features as the human expert. On two public datasets, this method shows better performance compared to existing explainable approaches, despite the additive explainability modality through the visual prototypes. In addition to the performance evaluations, we conducted an analysis of truthfulness by examining the joint information between the target prediction and its explanation output. This was done in order to ensure that the explanation actually reasons the target classification. Through extensive hyperparameter studies, we also found optimal model settings, providing a starting point for further research. Our work emphasises the prospects of combining xAI approaches for greater explainability and demonstrates that incorporating explainability does not necessarily lead to a loss of performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.