Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567713›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Efficient deep learning model for classifying lung cancer images using normalized stain agnostic feature method and FastAI-2.

Pranshu Saxena, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Mamoon Rashid, Sultan S Alshamrani, Mrim M Alnfiai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pranshu SaxenaSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Technology, Bennett University, Greater Noida, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0822-1532
Sanjay Kumar SinghUniversity School of Automation and Robotics, Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University, Delhi, India.
Mamoon RashidSchool of Information Communication and Technology, Bahrain Polytechnic, Isa Town, Bahrain.
Sultan S AlshamraniDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-9354
Mrim M AlnfiaiDepartment of Information Technology, College of Computers and Information Technology, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-6313

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer has the highest global fatality rate, with diagnosis primarily relying on histological tissue sample analysis. Accurate classification is critical for treatment planning and patient outcomes. Methods: This study develops a computer-assisted diagnosis system for non-small cell lung cancer histology classification, utilizing the FastAI-2 framework with a modified ResNet-34 architecture. The methodology includes stain normalization using LAB colour space for colour consistency, followed by deep learning-based classification. The proposed model is trained on the LC25000 dataset and compared with VGG11 and SqueezeNet1_1, demonstrating modified ResNet-34's optimal balance between depth and performance. FastAI-2 enhances computational efficiency, enabling rapid convergence with minimal training time. Results: The proposed system achieved 99.78% accuracy, confirming the effectiveness of automated lung cancer histopathology classification. This study highlights the potential of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostic tools to assist pathologists by improving accuracy, reducing workload, and enhancing decision-making in clinical settings.

Indexed as

ClassificationDeep learningDiagnosisHistopathological imagesLung cancer

Identifiers

PMID40567713
PMCPMC12192963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.