ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Predicting no-shows at outpatient appointments in internal medicine using machine learning models.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- When evidence meets artificial intelligence.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The high prevalence of patient absenteeism in medical appointments poses significant challenges for healthcare providers and patients, causing delays in service delivery and increasing operational inefficiencies. Addressing this issue is crucial in the internal medicine department, a fundamental pillar of comprehensive adult healthcare that manages various chronic and complex conditions. To mitigate absenteeism, we present an innovative application of machine learning models specifically designed to predict the risk of patient absenteeism in the internal medicine department of Fundación Valle del Lili, a high-complexity hospital in Colombia. Leveraging an institutional database, we conducted a statistical analysis to identify critical variables influencing absenteeism risk, including clinical and sociodemographic factors and characteristics of previously attended appointments. Our study evaluated seven distinct machine learning models, explored various data processing techniques, and addressed class imbalance through oversampling and undersampling strategies. Hyperparameter optimization was conducted for each model configuration, culminating in selecting the Bagging RandomForest model, which demonstrated outstanding performance when combined with standardized data and balanced using the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE). Additionally, Shapley values (SHAP) were applied to enhance the interpretability of the model, enabling the identification of the most influential variables in predicting medical absenteeism, such as the number of previous absences, the day and month of the appointment, and diagnosed diseases. The selected model achieved a predictive accuracy of 84.80 ± 0.81%, an AUC value of 0.89, an F1-score of 84.75%, and a recall of 83.02% in cross-validation experiments. These results highlight the potential of our experimental approach to identify the most suitable model for proactively predicting patients at high risk of absenteeism, optimizing resource allocation, and improving the quality of medical care in internal medicine in the future. Our methodology provides a foundation for reducing operational inefficiencies and strengthening intervention strategies. This benefits healthcare providers and patients through more timely and effective care. Ultimately, this approach contributes to improving patient outcomes and institutional efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.