ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
An activity theory-based exploration of "Eyeland", a task-based serious game for EFL visually impaired students.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of multisensory tactile‑auditory integration teaching on systematic anatomy learning in visually impaired medical students.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how the Eyeland app, an accessible task-based serious game for English as a foreign language (EFL), can remediate traditional lessons for both visually impaired students (VISs) and sighted students (those without visual impairments) in a public high school in Colombia. Using an activity theory framework and its derived model, the Activity Theory-Based Model of Serious Games (ATMSG), the study explores the characteristics of traditional EFL lessons designed for these students, the adjustments made while integrating the Eyeland app, and the resulting changes in student experiences. The research employed action research cycles involving teachers in reflective processes that included planning, observing, acting, and re-planning to adapt and integrate Eyeland into the classroom. Qualitative research methods-field observations, focus groups, usability surveys, teacher interviews, and document analysis-were used to collect data and analyze how Eyeland was implemented and its effects on teaching and learning. Findings indicate that Eyeland effectively remediated traditional lessons by offering accessible, interactive features such as auditory, tactile, and visual support. These enhancements improved engagement for both sighted and visually impaired students. Traditional EFL lessons, which relied heavily on visual materials and teacher-centered methods, were transformed into more interactive, task-based activities that encouraged greater collaboration and student autonomy. Adjustments included redesigning lesson plans and rearranging classroom layouts to foster inclusion. Both sighted and visually impaired students reported positive experiences, particularly valuing the increased autonomy and engagement provided by Eyeland's interactive tasks. The study highlights significant changes made to the lessons, with visually impaired students reporting predominantly positive experiences, though some teachers were reluctant to engage with the app. Eyeland contributed to the creation of inclusive classrooms by shifting from a teacher-centered approach to a student-centered learning environment that promoted better language learning outcomes. ATMSG was instrumental in analyzing how Eyeland fostered inclusive learning practices and provided valuable insights into re-mediation strategies, pedagogical planning, and the development of accessible content for EFL learners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.