ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genetic determinants of metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation and machine learning prediction of COVID-19.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the application of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to predict mortality in adult patients. However, the development of machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19 remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiple machine learning models in forecasting mortality among hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients. In this cohort study, we used the SIVEP-Gripe dataset, a public resource maintained by the Ministry of Health, to track severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Brazil. To create subsets for training and testing the machine learning (ML) models, we divided the primary dataset into three parts. Using these subsets, we developed and trained 12 ML algorithms to predict the outcomes. We assessed the performance of these models using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 37 variables examined, 24 were found to be potential indicators of mortality, as determined by the chi-square test of independence. The Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 92.5% and an AUC of 80.1%, on the optimized dataset. Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) and AdaBoost (ADA), closely followed the LR algorithm, producing similar results. Our study also revealed that baseline reduced oxygen saturation, presence of comorbidities, and older age were the most relevant factors in predicting mortality in children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The use of ML models can be an asset in making clinical decisions and implementing evidence-based patient management strategies, which can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of medical care. LR, GBC, and ADA models have demonstrated efficiency in accurately predicting mortality in COVID-19 pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.