Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567691›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Comparative performance of twelve machine learning models in predicting COVID-19 mortality risk in children: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Brazil.

Adriano Lages Dos Santos, Maria Christina L Oliveira, Enrico A Colosimo, Robert H Mak, Clara C Pinhati, Stella C Gallante, Hercílio Martelli-Júnior, Ana Cristina Simões E Silva, Eduardo A Oliveira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Adriano Lages Dos SantosEngineering and Informatics, Federal Institute of Science and Technology of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Maria Christina L OliveiraDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Enrico A ColosimoDepartment of Statistics, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Robert H MakDivision of Pediatric Nephrology, Rady Children's Hospital, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States.
Clara C PinhatiDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Stella C GallanteDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Hercílio Martelli-JúniorDepartment of Health Sciences, School of Odontology, Montes Claros State University, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ana Cristina Simões E SilvaDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Eduardo A OliveiraDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has catalyzed the application of advanced digital technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) to predict mortality in adult patients. However, the development of machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes in children and adolescents with COVID-19 remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of multiple machine learning models in forecasting mortality among hospitalized pediatric COVID-19 patients. In this cohort study, we used the SIVEP-Gripe dataset, a public resource maintained by the Ministry of Health, to track severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Brazil. To create subsets for training and testing the machine learning (ML) models, we divided the primary dataset into three parts. Using these subsets, we developed and trained 12 ML algorithms to predict the outcomes. We assessed the performance of these models using various metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, recall, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Among the 37 variables examined, 24 were found to be potential indicators of mortality, as determined by the chi-square test of independence. The Logistic Regression (LR) algorithm achieved the highest performance, with an accuracy of 92.5% and an AUC of 80.1%, on the optimized dataset. Gradient boosting classifier (GBC) and AdaBoost (ADA), closely followed the LR algorithm, producing similar results. Our study also revealed that baseline reduced oxygen saturation, presence of comorbidities, and older age were the most relevant factors in predicting mortality in children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The use of ML models can be an asset in making clinical decisions and implementing evidence-based patient management strategies, which can enhance patient outcomes and overall quality of medical care. LR, GBC, and ADA models have demonstrated efficiency in accurately predicting mortality in COVID-19 pediatric patients.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChildrenCOVID-19Death predictionHealthcareMachine learningMortalityRisk

Identifiers

PMID40567691
PMCPMC12192853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.