Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567687›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

A novel brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging dataset (Gazi Brains 2020): initial benchmark results and comprehensive analysis.

Seref Sagiroglu, Ramazan Terzi, Emrah Celtikci, Alp Özgün Börcek, Yilmaz Atay, Bilgehan Arslan, Mustafa Caglar Sahin, Kerem Nernekli, Umut Demirezen, Okan Bilge Ozdemir and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Seref SagirogluComputer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Ramazan TerziComputer Engineering, Amasya University, Amasya, Turkey.
Emrah CeltikciMedicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Alp Özgün BörcekMedicine, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-382X
Yilmaz AtayComputer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3298-3334
Bilgehan ArslanComputer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mustafa Caglar SahinNeurosurgery, Kulu State Hospital, Konya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5141-8154
Kerem NernekliInternal Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine, New York City, United States.
Umut DemirezenComputer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Okan Bilge OzdemirComputer Engineering, Artvin Coruh University, Artvin, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2829-3672
Kevser Özdem KaracaComputer Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.
Nuh AzgınoğluComputer Engineering, Kayseri University, Kayseri, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents a new benchmark MRI dataset called the Gazi Brains Dataset 2020, containing MRI images of 100 patients, and introduces initial experimental results performed on this dataset in comparison with available brain MRI datasets. Furthermore, the dataset is analyzed using eight different deep learning models for high-grade glioma tumor prediction, classification, and detection tasks. Additionally, this study demonstrates the results of an explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approach applied to the trained models. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed dataset, different deep learning models were applied to the problem, and these models were tested on various data and models applied for various tasks such as region of interest extraction, whole tumor segmentation, prediction, detection, and classification with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The experimental results indicate that the dataset is highly effective for multiple purposes, and the models reached significant results with successful F1-scores ranging between 93.2% and 96.4%. ROI and whole tumor segmentations were successfully performed and compared with seven algorithms with accuracies of 87.61% and 97.18%. The Grad-CAM model also demonstrated satisfactory accuracy across the tests that were conducted. Moreover, this study explores the application of XAI to the trained models, providing interpretability and insights into the decision-making processes. The findings signify that this dataset holds significant potential for various future research directions, including age estimation, gender detection, causal inference with XAI, and disease-related survival analysis.

Indexed as

Anomaly detectionBenchmarkClassificationDeep learningGazi Brains 2020ModellingMRIPredictionSegmentationTurkish brain project

Identifiers

PMID40567687
PMCPMC12192951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.