ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
A novel brain tumor magnetic resonance imaging dataset (Gazi Brains 2020): initial benchmark results and comprehensive analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pathomics-based machine learning models for optimizing LungPro navigational bronchoscopy in peripheral lung lesion diagnosis: a retrospective study.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents a new benchmark MRI dataset called the Gazi Brains Dataset 2020, containing MRI images of 100 patients, and introduces initial experimental results performed on this dataset in comparison with available brain MRI datasets. Furthermore, the dataset is analyzed using eight different deep learning models for high-grade glioma tumor prediction, classification, and detection tasks. Additionally, this study demonstrates the results of an explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) approach applied to the trained models. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed dataset, different deep learning models were applied to the problem, and these models were tested on various data and models applied for various tasks such as region of interest extraction, whole tumor segmentation, prediction, detection, and classification with accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The experimental results indicate that the dataset is highly effective for multiple purposes, and the models reached significant results with successful F1-scores ranging between 93.2% and 96.4%. ROI and whole tumor segmentations were successfully performed and compared with seven algorithms with accuracies of 87.61% and 97.18%. The Grad-CAM model also demonstrated satisfactory accuracy across the tests that were conducted. Moreover, this study explores the application of XAI to the trained models, providing interpretability and insights into the decision-making processes. The findings signify that this dataset holds significant potential for various future research directions, including age estimation, gender detection, causal inference with XAI, and disease-related survival analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.