ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Recent advances in the inverse design of silicon photonic devices and related platforms using deep generative models.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article presents an overview of recent research on the inverse design of optical devices using deep generative models. The increasing complexity of modern optical devices necessitates advanced design methodologies that can efficiently navigate vast parameter spaces and generate novel, high-performance structures. Established optimization methods, such as adjoint and topology optimization, have successfully addressed many design challenges. However, the increasing complexity of modern optical devices creates opportunities for complementary approaches. Deep generative models offer additional capabilities by leveraging their ability to learn complex patterns and generate novel designs. This review examines various deep learning methodologies, including multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), convolutional neural networks (CNN), auto-encoders (AE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. We analyze their applications in the inverse design of photonic devices, comparing their effectiveness and integration in the design process. Our findings indicate that while MLP-based methods were commonly used in early research, recent studies have increasingly employed CNN, GAN, AE, and RL methods, as well as advanced MLP models. Each of these methods offers unique advantages and presents specific challenges in the context of optical device inverse design. This review critically evaluates these deep learning-based inverse design technologies, highlighting their strengths and limitations in the context of optical device design. By synthesizing current research and identifying key trends, this article aims to guide future developments in the application of deep generative models for optical device inverse design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.