Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567675›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Recent advances in the inverse design of silicon photonic devices and related platforms using deep generative models.

Sun Jae Baek, Minhyeok Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sun Jae BaekDepartment of Intelligent Semiconductor Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of South Korea.
Minhyeok LeeDepartment of Intelligent Semiconductor Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article presents an overview of recent research on the inverse design of optical devices using deep generative models. The increasing complexity of modern optical devices necessitates advanced design methodologies that can efficiently navigate vast parameter spaces and generate novel, high-performance structures. Established optimization methods, such as adjoint and topology optimization, have successfully addressed many design challenges. However, the increasing complexity of modern optical devices creates opportunities for complementary approaches. Deep generative models offer additional capabilities by leveraging their ability to learn complex patterns and generate novel designs. This review examines various deep learning methodologies, including multi-layer perceptrons (MLP), convolutional neural networks (CNN), auto-encoders (AE), Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN), and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches. We analyze their applications in the inverse design of photonic devices, comparing their effectiveness and integration in the design process. Our findings indicate that while MLP-based methods were commonly used in early research, recent studies have increasingly employed CNN, GAN, AE, and RL methods, as well as advanced MLP models. Each of these methods offers unique advantages and presents specific challenges in the context of optical device inverse design. This review critically evaluates these deep learning-based inverse design technologies, highlighting their strengths and limitations in the context of optical device design. By synthesizing current research and identifying key trends, this article aims to guide future developments in the application of deep generative models for optical device inverse design.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningGenerative modelsInverse designMachine learningNanophotonic devicesOptical design

Identifiers

PMID40567675
PMCPMC12192857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.