Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567657›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Dynamic prediction of carbon prices based on the multi-frequency combined model.

Yonghui Duan, Yingying Fan, Xiang Wang, Kaige Liu, Xiaotong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yonghui DuanSchool of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Yingying FanSchool of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Xiang WangSchool of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou Aviation Industry Management College, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Kaige LiuSchool of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.
Xiaotong ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a central participant and important leader in the global climate governance system, China is facing the urgent need to predict and regulate the price of carbon emissions to promote the sound development of its carbon market. In this article, a rolling prediction model based on Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-cheetah optimization algorithm-extreme gradient boosting (Lasso-COA-XGBoost) carbon price decomposition integration is proposed to address the defects of low prediction accuracy and insufficient model stability of a single machine learning model in the carbon price prediction problem. During the modeling process, the adaptive Lasso method is first employed to select factors from 15 primary indicators of carbon prices, identifying the most important influencing factors. Next, the COA-XGBoost model is built and the parameters of the XGBoost model are optimized using the COA algorithm. Finally, the complete ensemble empirical Mode Decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAM) method is utilized to decompose the residual sequence of the COA-XGBoost model and reconstruct it into high-frequency and low-frequency components. Appropriate frequency models are applied to achieve error correction, thereby constructing the combined Lasso-COA-XGBoost-CEEMDAN model. To further enhance the predictive accuracy and practicality of the model, a rolling time window is introduced for forecasting in the Hubei and Guangzhou carbon emission trading markets, ensuring that the forecasting model can adapt to market changes in real-time. The experimental results show that, taking the carbon price prediction in Hubei as an example, the proposed hybrid model has a significant improvement in prediction accuracy compared with the comparison model (XGBoost model): the RMSE is improved by 99.9987%, the MAE is improved by 99.9039%, the MAPE is improved by 99.9960%, and the R

Indexed as

Carbon price forecastingCheetah optimization algorithmError correctionHybrid prediction

Identifiers

PMID40567657
PMCPMC12190694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.