ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Enhancing analogy-based software cost estimation using Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing analogy-based software cost estimation using Grey Wolf Optimization algorithm.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate software cost estimation (SCE) is a critical factor in the successful delivery of software projects, as highlighted by industry statistics indicating that only some of the projects comply with the predicted budget. Among the software estimation methods, analogy-based estimation (ABE) is one of the most popular ones. Although this method has been customized in recent years with the help of optimization algorithms to achieve better results, the use of more powerful optimization algorithms can be effective in achieving better results in software size estimation. This study presents an innovative approach to SCE that integrates the grey wolf optimization (GWO) algorithm to enhance the precision of ABE. The GWO algorithm, inspired by the hunting behavior and social hierarchy of grey wolves, is mathematically modeled and incorporated into the ABE approach. The key focus of this research is the optimization of the similarity function, a crucial component of the ABE, using both Euclidean and Manhattan distance measures. The article addresses the challenges in selecting an optimal similarity function and emphasizes the importance of proper feature weighting to improve estimation accuracy. The proposed GWO-based ABE method is rigorously evaluated on multiple software project datasets using cross-validation techniques. The performance of the GWO-based ABE is compared to other evolutionary algorithms based on widely accepted evaluation metrics. The results confirm that the integration of the GWO algorithm into ABE enhances estimation accuracy and model robustness. By optimizing feature weights in the similarity function, GWO-ABE effectively addresses key limitations of traditional analogy-based methods. The proposed approach demonstrates superior performance across multiple datasets, particularly under the Euclidean distance function, making it a reliable solution for software project cost estimation. Experimental evaluations show that GWO-ABE achieves notable improvements in key performance metrics, leading to reduced mean magnitude of relative error (MMRE), median magnitude of relative error (MdMRE), and higher percentage of prediction (PRED) compared to other ABE-customized methods. These findings highlight the role of metaheuristic optimization in improving software estimation techniques, contributing to more precise and efficient project planning and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.