Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567571›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2022

Can you hear me now? Momentary increase in smartphone usage enhances neural processing of task-irrelevant sound tones.

Mark van de Ruit, Arko Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark van de RuitDepartment of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Arko GhoshCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to popular belief when engaged on the smartphone surrounding information is ignored. However, emerging ideas based on laboratory-designed tasks suggest that the processing of task-irrelevant (distractor) information is enhanced when cognitive load is high as anticipated during intense periods of smartphone usage. Here we address the neural processing of task-irrelevant auditory tones while interacting with the smartphone touchscreen. We analyzed neural activity (EEG) while people (N = 24) were seated in public spaces and used their smartphones for ∼1.5 h. During this period, the number of touchscreen interactions spontaneously varied from one moment to another. The central and frontal theta-band (4-8 Hz) oscillations, an index of cognitive load, increased proportionally to the number of interactions. Moreover, an index of excitation:inhibition balance derived from the aperiodic signal components increased with the interactions. The auditory tones resulted in prominent evoked potentials with peaks at ∼50 ms, ∼100 ms, and ∼200 ms, reflecting the different cortical information processing stages. Of these, the ∼100 ms component was specifically related to the number of interactions such that the higher the number of interactions, the larger the neural signal amplitudes. Contrary to the popular notions but in keeping with emerging ideas on cognitive load, auditory information processing is enhanced with increased smartphone usage. In daily life, neural processing of the surroundings is partly shaped by the immediate cognitive demands imposed by the smartphone.

Identifiers

PMID40567571
PMCPMC12172703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.