Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567570›Full record

ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2022

What influence do face masks have on reading emotions in faces?

R Kleiser, T Raffelsberger, J Trenkler, S Meckel, R J Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R KleiserInstitute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler-University Linz, Austria.
T RaffelsbergerInstitute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler-University Linz, Austria.
J TrenklerInstitute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler-University Linz, Austria.
S MeckelInstitute of Neuroradiology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler-University Linz, Austria.
R J SeitzDepartment of Neurology, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past years, no event has affected people around the globe more than the SARS-COVID-2 pandemic. Besides the health system and the economy, it has affected social life. A grave sequela is the social distancing due to the ubiquitous use of medical face masks. Since these face masks cover approximately two thirds of the face including the mouth and nose, we hypothesized that they may impair affect reading of emotional face expressions. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging in 16 healthy volunteers to investigate brain activity changes related to the recognition of evolving emotional face expressions in short video-clips. We found that the face masks delayed emotion recognition, but at a normal nearly 100% success rate. This effect was related to a decreased activation in the cortical network mediating face recognition. Our data support the notion that face masks can have an adverse impact of social interactions.

Indexed as

EmotionsFace expressionsFace masksfMRI

Identifiers

PMID40567570
PMCPMC12172909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.