Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40567459›Full record

ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2024

Effect of Myofascial Release and Soft Tissue Mobilization versus Interferential Therapy with Exercises on Neck Musculoskeletal Related Syndromes: A Before and After Study.

Christian Chance Ndahiriwe, Emmy Bucyana, Malachie Tuyizere, Moussa Hakizimana, Jacques Nshimiyimana, Nuhu Assuman, Juliette Gasana, Jean de Dieu Rukundo, Jean Marie Vianney Semana, Ayyappan Jayavel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian Chance NdahiriweDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Emmy BucyanaDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Malachie TuyizereDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Moussa HakizimanaDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jacques NshimiyimanaDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Nuhu AssumanDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Juliette GasanaDepartment of Physiotherapy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean de Dieu RukundoDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Jean Marie Vianney SemanaDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Ayyappan JayavelSRM College of Physiotherapy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Kanchipuram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neck-related musculoskeletal disorders are classified among the top disabling conditions leading to discomfort, pain and functional restrictions which impact people's functions and performance. Aim: To assess the effects of soft tissue mobilization versus interferential therapy with exercises among adults with neck musculoskeletal syndromes. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two (32) participants in this study were randomly allocated to two groups. Experimental (n=16) received myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization. Control (n=16) received interferential therapy with conventional neck exercises for 6 weeks. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) Scores and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were used to measure the effect of the treatment interventions. Results: The findings from this intervention study showed a significant improvement in pain and disability. Unpaired (independent) t-test on NPRS and NDI scores between groups (NPRS t-test: -3.693 p=0.001) and (NDI t-test: -8.472, p=0.001) thus, favoring Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilization compared to IFT and exercises. Conclusion: Myofascial release and soft tissue mobilisation treatment provided greater benefits in terms of reduction of functional limitations and pain. IFT and exercise therapy showed improvement suggesting that a combination of both treatment approaches may yield better results than single treatment modality alone.

Indexed as

Interferential therapy and PostureMyofascial ReleaseSoft tissue mobilization

Identifiers

PMID40567459
PMCPMC12110477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.